King James I/VI led the kingdom through a relatively peaceful era.
Why is he both James I and VI?
Let’s start with James’s mother Mary, Queen of Scots, who was forced to abdicate when he was just a baby. He then became King James VI of Scotland. He was the 6th James to take the Scottish throne.
The devoutly Catholic Mary had often clashed with her Protestant half-sister, Queen Elizabeth I of England. Mary expected to take the English throne after Elizabeth, incorrectly assuming that she had plenty of power as both Queen of Scotland and Queen Consort of France to do so.
However, Mary’s laundry list of Protestant executions meant that the people were not happy with her or Catholics. Any thought of Catholic rule in England upset many people, especially Elizabeth. The queen had thrown her weight behind her father’s Anglican church, and knew Mary had designs on her throne. When she discovered that Mary was plotting against her, Elizabeth imprisoned and eventually executed her. The terror of “Bloody Mary” was at an end.
James, who had succeeded Mary when he was but a baby, was now an adult and could rule as he saw fit. He decided to make an alliance with his Auntie Elizabeth and signed the Treaty of Berwick, known as a ‘league of amity’ between Scotland and England.
Mary’s Heir Becomes Elizabeth’s Heir
Since Queen Elizabeth I was unmarried and childless, the crown had to pass to someone else. That someone was James. Ordinarily, the Catholics of England would’ve been thrilled with the prospect of Mary’s heir taking the throne, but James turned out to be strictly Protestant. The hopes of another Catholic rule were dashed as James succeeded Elizabeth in 1603. As James I of England/James VI of Scotland, he tried to unite his two countries on all levels, but in the end, most things were symbolic only. Scotland retained its parliament and separate economy. James, however, insisted that he be known as King of Great Britain and Ireland, a more unifying title.
Why Was He Protestant?
When Mary abdicated, her son was a baby who could barely walk yet. Therefore regents ran the affairs of state, but it was not a pleasant scenario. Scores of regents, like Roman emperors, were killed and replaced by yet another doomed regent.
Meanwhile, young King James’ childhood studies were seen to by his tutor, George Buchanan. Reading and writing weren’t the only things Buchanan taught him – he was adamant that the future king would be god-fearing, but as a Protestant, not a Catholic. Buchanan succeeded.
James was a big believer in the divine right of kings (Dieu et mon droit) and was disdainful of Parliament. He even ruled without Parliament for a time, annoyed that they would not grant him the money he requested (money he needed due to mismanagement of funds within his court). His autocratic tendencies would cause difficulties for his successors later on, resulting in the English Civil War.
Autocratic But Intellectual
Despite his fiscal problems, James proved to be quite scholarly and intellectual. He wrote poetry and was a patron of the arts. It is because of this king we have the King James Bible, the English translation of the Old and New Testaments dating from 1611.
Things Begin To Fall Apart
James was held in high esteem by his people for his peaceful tenure, but the tensions between the king and his government were rising. Once his son, Charles I, took the throne, things took a bad turn. As mentioned, James passed on his dangerous appreciation for absolute rule, and Charles took it very seriously.
Charles I made more than a few enemies, especially for the way he accrued his wealth. The king derived money through the granting of monopolies and reintroduced many unpopular taxes that angered a lot of people. As if that wasn’t bad enough, he rankled the Scottish nobility by employing the Act of Revocation – all gifts of royal or church land made to the Scottish aristocrats were revoked. To further rub salt in the wound, any continued ownership of said lands would be charged rent.
Charles’s defiance of Parliament during the Irish Rebellion didn’t help his reputation, either. He was tried for treason and “other high crimes” for his behavior. Charles staunchly refused to enter a plea when asked – on the grounds that no court had jurisdiction over a monarch.
The king’s successor, also named Charles, was declared by the Parliament of Scotland to be Charles II in February 1649. The English Parliament was none too pleased by this, and immediately passed a statute that made Scotland’s proclamation unlawful. The English republic was born via “An Act declaring England to be a Commonwealth” in May 1649.
Power was now in the hands of the Council of State, which included that famous republican, Oliver Cromwell. He came to blows with Charles II during the Battle of Worcester in 1651, roundly defeating him. Charles abandoned England and fled to Europe.
A new constitution, known as the Instrument of Government, was brought forward soon after. It effectively made Cromwell Lord Protector for life.
With Charles out of the way and new powers in hand, Cromwell flexed his muscles. He turned into a dictator, brutalizing Ireland and became the kingly figure he so despised. He was in the position for life, chose his successor (his son), and was referred to as “His Highness”.
Charles, meanwhile, spent the next nine years in exile in France. He was asked to return and reign as king after the disastrous rule of Cromwell’s son, Richard. The younger Cromwell was forced to abdicate in 1659, taking the Protectorate with him.
Charles II returned to England, and his coronation took place at Westminster Abbey on April 23rd, 1661. He was overjoyed to be reinstated as the rightful king, but his joy would not last.
Fighting It Out
Charles’s support of France and his hand in the Third Anglo-Dutch War caused consternation among Britain’s political elite. They were also angry over the king’s increasing attempts to secure himself as an absolute monarch. Charles had dissolved Parliament four times in an attempt to establish a more moderate one!
When Charles II died, the scramble began to find a successor, preferably Protestant. Charles never had any legitimate children, so the next in line for the throne was his brother, James (James II of England and VII of Scotland).
James was exactly what the political and religious anti-Catholics feared: he developed very close ties to France and was pro-Catholic. So pro-Catholic, in fact, that he converted to the faith. The fact was not made public until later, but by converting, James annoyed Charles II so much that the king insisted that James’s two surviving daughters, Mary and Anne, be raised as Protestants.
James had produced several children with his wife, Lady Anne Hyde. Only two daughters survived into adulthood – Princesses Mary and Anne. Mary, wed to the Dutch prince William of Orange, was set to be the next in line for the throne.
When Lady Anne died, James remarried Mary of Modena, with whom he had a son, James Francis Edward Stuart. There was now a male – and Catholic – heir to the throne.
The legion of anti-Catholic powerhouses now called upon William of Orange to depose James and sit on the throne as a Protestant king with his wife, Mary. On November 5th, 1688, William obliged by invading England in what became known as “The Glorious Revolution”. With this revolution, there was a permanent shift in power. The sovereign and the monarchy itself would be representative of the nation, but Parliament had now become a permanent feature of government and politics that could rein in any king or queen.
James escaped to France, where there were sure to be friendly faces. This was declared abdication, and thus William and Mary took the throne of England as co-monarchs, crowned on April 11, 1689. This was a first in the history of the kingdom, and nothing like it has happened since.
After Mary’s death in 1694, William continued as sole monarch. Her sister Anne was now William’s only successor.
Anne had 17 children with her husband, Prince George of Denmark. After several miscarriages and stillborns, only one survived past infancy. They named their son William, and created him Duke of Gloucester. Sadly, he died at the age of 11 due to complications of hydrocephalus, or “water” in the brain.
The Question of Succession
With a childless William III and Anne bereft of her heir, the Protestant succession looked precarious. The English Parliament refused to let the throne fall into Catholic hands, and so they passed the Act of Settlement 1701. The Act forbade any Catholic from sitting on the throne, and barred any royal from even marrying a Catholic. If they defied the Act, they were thrown out of the line of succession.
When the Act was created, it put the Protestant Electress Sophia of Hanover in direct line to the throne. Sophia was a granddaughter of James I (VI) through his daughter, Elizabeth Stuart. Sophia’s father was Frederick V, Elector Palatine (Bavaria).
Anne ascended the thrones of England, Scotland and Ireland upon the death of William III in March 1702. In May 1707, under the Act of Union, Queen Anne’s kingdoms of England and Scotland were united. From that point on, it was known the Kingdom of Great Britain.
Queen Anne was a good 34 years younger than her successor, Sophia. Regardless, Anne, suffering from gout, died at the relatively young age 49. It had been mere weeks after the death of the 83-year-old Electress.
Establishing a Dynasty
Sophia’s son, George Louis of Brunswick-Lüneburg, became King George I of Great Britain. There were three more Georges in the Hanoverian line, followed by William IV, and finally Queen Victoria. Upon her marriage to Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, the Hanoverian line technically ended. The dynasty became known as the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha until World War I. Victoria’s grandson, King George V, renamed the royal family to distance them from the anti-German sentiments that prevailed due to the war. Thus, the House of Windsor was born.